SEBI Board Decisions – Good And Not So Good

Identification of ultimate beneficiary under p-note has always been a challenge for market regulator since the framing of SEBI (FII) Regulations in 1995. From time to time, SEBI has been tweaking with the rules of game to enhance the disclosure and reporting requirements in this regard but till date the existing regulations have failed to yield the desired results. The recent decision of the SEBI Board is in response to recommendations of Special Investigation Team (SIT) set up by the Hon’ble Supreme Court to trace out black money. The SIT had expressed concern with regard to identification of beneficial owners and transferability of p-notes. SEBI has therefore now proposed that all FIIs shall uniformly comply with SEBI prescribed KYC norms (irrespective of the jurisdiction of issuance of p-note or jurisdiction of beneficiaries of such p-note) and they will give detailed periodical reports. These measures are likely to result in more transparency and positive impact on integrity of the market. The ultimate outcome however will depend upon implementation of the new mandate and quality of analysis that would be done by SEBI and other agencies, of the information provided by the FIIs.

A grey area in the whole process which will still continue is that if it is found by SEBI or other investigating agencies that the money brought in by certain investors through p-note route is violative of Prevention of Money Laundering Act (“PMLA”), SEBI can take action against the FII, being an intermediary registered with SEBI, but it will have little power to take any enforcement action against the overseas investor except for preventing such investor from further investment in the indian securities market through the route of p-note or otherwise. Investigating agencies concerned with enforcement of PMLA will also have to depend upon foreign/international agencies to bring the culprits to book and the whole process in this regard would be cumbersome and time consuming. Nonetheless, regulatory and enforcement agencies would be certainly better of in preventing further pollution of the securities market with bad and illegal money as compared to a situation where they do not have any effective mechanism to detect circulation of such money.

Another proposal of SEBI to prescribe that the subscribers to p-note will not be able to transfer the same to another subscriber without prior approval of the issuer i.e. FII, is likely to affect free transferability of p-note and thereby impacting its liquidity. Appropriate reporting by FII about any transfer during the preceding month would have perhaps served the desired purpose.

SEBI Board has also proposed to insert a guidance note in the settlement regulations so as to make it clear that all other breaches can be settled through the process of consent proceedings except the breaches which have market wide implications. The relevant provisions to this effect are indeed already contained in the SEBI regulations and the need for inserting guidance note appears to have stemmed from the realization that the existing provisions are not clear enough. The guidance note is expected to make the market participants better understand the provisions and to avail the consent process. While it may be true to a certain extent but there is another reality also that several consent applications are rejected by the SEBI officials on other grounds as well. There is an element of arbitrariness in the process of rejection of consent applications by the persons concerned. Since the remedy of filing appeal before SAT against such rejection is generally not available, there is an urgent need to put in place some review mechanism within SEBI at the level of Chairman. A procedure may be evolved whereby any rejection of consent application is placed before the review committee headed by Chairman before the decision of rejection is communicated to the persons concerned. This may go a long way in checking the arbitrary actions of SEBI officials in rejecting the applications which are otherwise maintainable.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Media Coverage

About Dhaval Vussonji

Ask a question

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Legal Disclaimer

User Acknowledgement

By proceeding further and clicking on the “AGREE” button herein below, I acknowledge that I of my own accord wish to know more about Dhaval Vussonji & Associates for my own information and use. I further acknowledge that there has been no solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from Dhaval Vussonji & Associates or any of its members to create an Attorney-Client relationship through this knowledgesite. I further acknowledge having read and understood the Disclaimer below.


This knowledgesite ( is a resource for informational purposes only and is intended, but not promised or guaranteed, to be correct, complete, and up-to-date. Dhaval Vussonji & Associates (DVA) does not warrant that the information contained on this knowledgesite is accurate or complete, and hereby disclaims any and all liability to any person for any loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or any other cause.

DVA further assumes no liability for the interpretation and/or use of the information contained on this knowledgesite, nor does it offer a warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The owner of this knowledgesite does not intend links from this site to other internet knowledgesites to be referrals to, endorsements of, or affiliations with the linked entities. DVA is not responsible for, and makes no representations or warranties about, the contents of Web sites to which links may be provided from this Web site.

This knowledgesite is not intended to be a source of advertising or solicitation and the contents of the knowledgesite should not be construed as legal advice. The reader should not consider this information to be an invitation for a lawyer-client relationship and should not rely on information provided herein and should always seek the advice of competent counsel licensed to practice in the relevant country/state. Transmission, receipt or use of this knowledgesite does not constitute or create a lawyer-client relationship. No recipients of content from this knowledgesite should act, or refrain from acting, based upon any or all of the contents of this site.

Furthermore, the owner of this knowledgesite does not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based solely upon viewing this knowledgesite or in a country/state where this knowledgesite fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state. Finally, the reader is warned that the use of Internet e-mail for confidential or sensitive information is susceptible to risks of lack of confidentiality associated with sending email over the Internet.