New CIRP Regulations Amendment All Set To Revolutionize The CIRP Process

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) (Fourth Amendment) Regulations, 2022 (“Amendment Regulations”) issued on 16th September 2022 have brought in its fold a very crucial amendment to the IBBI (CIRP) Regulations, 2016 (“the Regulations”). It is likely that the Amendment Regulations will bring about a change that has the potential to revolutionize the CIRP Process of Real Estate companies undergoing insolvency.

Until now, it was mandatory for the Resolution Professional (“RP”) appointed under the IBC to seek resolution of the corporate debtor as a whole. In the matter of– Binani Industries Limited vs. Bank of Baroda and Anr. the NCLAT has held as follows :

“The ‘I&B Code’ defines ‘Resolution Plan’ as a plan for insolvency resolution of the ‘Corporate Debtor’ as a going concern. It does not spell out the shape, colour and texture of ‘Resolution Plan’, which is left to imagination of stakeholders…
.. It is not a sale. No one is selling or buying the ‘Corporate Debtor’ through a ‘Resolution Plan’. It is resolution of the ‘Corporate Debtor’ as a going concern. One does not need a ‘Resolution Plan’ for selling the ‘Corporate Debtor’. If it were a sale, one can put it on a trading platform. Whosoever pays the highest price would get it.”
Contrary to the above position, Clause 9 of the Amendment Regulations, has introduced a new sub-regulation 6A in Regulation 36B of the Regulations which reads as follows :-

“(6A) If the resolution professional, does not receive a resolution plan in response to the request under this regulation, he may, with the approval of the committee, issue request for resolution plan for sale of one or more of assets of the corporate debtor.”
Under the Sub -regulation 7 of Regulation 36B, if the resolution professional did not receive a resolution plan in response to his request or the resolution plan was not satisfactory, he had the option to re-issue a request for the resolution plans, with the approval of the CoC, subject to the condition that the request is made to all prospective resolution applicants in the final list.

However, the new sub regulation 6A, now provides an additional option to the resolution professional in case a resolution plan is not received by him, i.e. to invite resolution plans from prospective resolution applicants for part of the assets of the corporate debtor.

It is pertinent to note that the new sub regulation 6A enables the RP to sell part of the assets of the corporate debtor only if NO resolution plan is received.

It is also imperative to consider as to what happens in a situation where the resolution plan received by the resolution plan is not satisfactory or does not meet the requirements of the COC. While the new amendment does not address this situation, as per the current amendment, it appears that in such a situation, the resolution professional will have no other alternative, other than perhaps resorting to sub-regulation (7) of Regulation 36B as discussed above, and invite new resolution applications.

While it is evident from the provision, that it requires approval from the Committee of Creditors, it remains unclear whether it would require a simple majority approval or an approval by a special majority. The decision for sale of part assets of the corporate debtor ought to require the approval of a special majority of the CoC since it may be misused by some creditors of the CoC over others.

In the post pandemic world, there are a number of real estate companies in distress undergoing insolvency before various benches of the NCLT. This new provision, may provide a boost to incoming resolution applicants and will certainly attract the interest of reconstruction companies who may be now willing to purchase part of the assets of these distressed companies. Interestingly, while the new amendment enables the RP to sell part of the assets of the Corporate Debtor, it does not deal with the question of the treatment of the liabilities on that asset vis-à-vis the proceeds of sale. In real estate companies, it is typical that liabilities are attached to specific assets and the business plans are also evolved asset wise and therefore when one asset fails and the resolution requires lenders/ creditors who did not have exposure to that asset to now understand its background and to decide its future (as also gain from the proceeds of this asset), it creates a very anomalous situation.

Another important amendment that has been made to the Regulations, is the introduction of new Regulation 39 BA, which requires the committee of creditors to examine and explore a last resort compromise or arrangement with the corporate debtor during the period that the application to liquidate the corporate debtor is pending before the NCLT.

This provision also gives further impetus and emphasis to the purpose of the Insolvency Code, which is resolution of insolvency of companies.

The above amendments are extremely crucial for companies, especially real estate companies undergoing insolvencies, and is certain to change the course of resolutions going forward.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Media Coverage

About Dhaval Vussonji

Ask a question

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Legal Disclaimer

User Acknowledgement

By proceeding further and clicking on the “AGREE” button herein below, I acknowledge that I of my own accord wish to know more about Dhaval Vussonji & Associates for my own information and use. I further acknowledge that there has been no solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from Dhaval Vussonji & Associates or any of its members to create an Attorney-Client relationship through this knowledgesite. I further acknowledge having read and understood the Disclaimer below.


This knowledgesite ( is a resource for informational purposes only and is intended, but not promised or guaranteed, to be correct, complete, and up-to-date. Dhaval Vussonji & Associates (DVA) does not warrant that the information contained on this knowledgesite is accurate or complete, and hereby disclaims any and all liability to any person for any loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or any other cause.

DVA further assumes no liability for the interpretation and/or use of the information contained on this knowledgesite, nor does it offer a warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The owner of this knowledgesite does not intend links from this site to other internet knowledgesites to be referrals to, endorsements of, or affiliations with the linked entities. DVA is not responsible for, and makes no representations or warranties about, the contents of Web sites to which links may be provided from this Web site.

This knowledgesite is not intended to be a source of advertising or solicitation and the contents of the knowledgesite should not be construed as legal advice. The reader should not consider this information to be an invitation for a lawyer-client relationship and should not rely on information provided herein and should always seek the advice of competent counsel licensed to practice in the relevant country/state. Transmission, receipt or use of this knowledgesite does not constitute or create a lawyer-client relationship. No recipients of content from this knowledgesite should act, or refrain from acting, based upon any or all of the contents of this site.

Furthermore, the owner of this knowledgesite does not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based solely upon viewing this knowledgesite or in a country/state where this knowledgesite fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state. Finally, the reader is warned that the use of Internet e-mail for confidential or sensitive information is susceptible to risks of lack of confidentiality associated with sending email over the Internet.